Fix broken link to Google coding standard

This commit is contained in:
Eric Pederson
2016-06-30 13:04:20 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 7966043dfa
commit 7275d2fcc5

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
* https://www.gitbook.com/book/alexastva/the-ultimate-question-of-programming-refactoring-/details - The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything * https://www.gitbook.com/book/alexastva/the-ultimate-question-of-programming-refactoring-/details - The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything
* http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html - LLVM Coding Standards - very well written * http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html - LLVM Coding Standards - very well written
* http://geosoft.no/development/cppstyle.html * http://geosoft.no/development/cppstyle.html
* http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml (Note that Google's standard document makes several recommendations which we will NOT be following. For example, they explicitly forbid the use of exceptions, which makes [RAII](http://blog2.emptycrate.com/content/nobody-understands-c-part-2-raii) impossible.) * https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html (Note that Google's standard document makes several recommendations which we will NOT be following. For example, they explicitly forbid the use of exceptions, which makes [RAII](http://blog2.emptycrate.com/content/nobody-understands-c-part-2-raii) impossible.)
* https://isocpp.org/faq/ * https://isocpp.org/faq/
* http://www.cplusplus.com/ * http://www.cplusplus.com/
* http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/128836/InDepth_Static_Code_Analysis.php - Article from John Carmack on the advantages of static analysis * http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/128836/InDepth_Static_Code_Analysis.php - Article from John Carmack on the advantages of static analysis