From 7275d2fcc5608be50dbf13e96e21b91cfb6f6055 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Pederson Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 13:04:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix broken link to Google coding standard --- 10-Further_Reading.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/10-Further_Reading.md b/10-Further_Reading.md index 9b93870..ad4e1f6 100644 --- a/10-Further_Reading.md +++ b/10-Further_Reading.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ * https://www.gitbook.com/book/alexastva/the-ultimate-question-of-programming-refactoring-/details - The Ultimate Question of Programming, Refactoring, and Everything * http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html - LLVM Coding Standards - very well written * http://geosoft.no/development/cppstyle.html - * http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml (Note that Google's standard document makes several recommendations which we will NOT be following. For example, they explicitly forbid the use of exceptions, which makes [RAII](http://blog2.emptycrate.com/content/nobody-understands-c-part-2-raii) impossible.) + * https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html (Note that Google's standard document makes several recommendations which we will NOT be following. For example, they explicitly forbid the use of exceptions, which makes [RAII](http://blog2.emptycrate.com/content/nobody-understands-c-part-2-raii) impossible.) * https://isocpp.org/faq/ * http://www.cplusplus.com/ * http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/128836/InDepth_Static_Code_Analysis.php - Article from John Carmack on the advantages of static analysis