Reword 3 occurrences of "special operations"

See #2224
This commit is contained in:
Herb Sutter
2024-10-24 11:38:06 -07:00
parent 5b98c70498
commit f3bc9dd1af

View File

@@ -6597,7 +6597,7 @@ Writing out the bodies of the copy and move operations is verbose, tedious, and
##### Enforcement
(Moderate) The body of a special operation should not have the same accessibility and semantics as the compiler-generated version, because that would be redundant
(Moderate) The body of a user-defined operation should not have the same semantics as the compiler-generated version, because that would be redundant.
### <a name="Rc-delete"></a>C.81: Use `=delete` when you want to disable default behavior (without wanting an alternative)
@@ -22648,7 +22648,7 @@ Prevent leaks. Leaks can lead to performance degradation, mysterious error, syst
// ...
};
This class is a resource handle. It manages the lifetime of the `T`s. To do so, `Vector` must define or delete [the set of special operations](#Rc-five) (constructors, a destructor, etc.).
This class is a resource handle. It manages the lifetime of the `T`s. To do so, `Vector` must define or delete [the copy, move, and destruction operations](#Rc-five).
##### Example
@@ -22795,7 +22795,7 @@ To provide complete control of the lifetime of the resource. To provide a cohere
##### Note
If all members are resource handles, rely on the default special operations where possible.
If all members are resource handles, rely on the compiler-generated operations where possible.
template<typename T> struct Named {
string name;