[conv.lval] # 7 Expressions [[expr]](./#expr) ## 7.3 Standard conversions [[conv]](conv#lval) ### 7.3.2 Lvalue-to-rvalue conversion [conv.lval] [1](#1) [#](http://github.com/Eelis/draft/tree/9adde4bc1c62ec234483e63ea3b70a59724c745a/source/expressions.tex#L612) A [glvalue](basic.lval#def:glvalue "7.2.1 Value category [basic.lval]") of a non-function, non-array type T can be converted to a prvalue[.](#1.sentence-1)[43](#footnote-43 "For historical reasons, this conversion is called the “lvalue-to-rvalue” conversion, even though that name does not accurately reflect the taxonomy of expressions described in [basic.lval].") If T is an incomplete type, a program that necessitates this conversion is ill-formed[.](#1.sentence-2) If T is a non-class type, the type of the prvalue is the cv-unqualified version of T[.](#1.sentence-3) Otherwise, the type of the prvalue is T[.](#1.sentence-4)[44](#footnote-44 "In C++ class and array prvalues can have cv-qualified types. This differs from C, in which non-lvalues never have cv-qualified types.") [2](#2) [#](http://github.com/Eelis/draft/tree/9adde4bc1c62ec234483e63ea3b70a59724c745a/source/expressions.tex#L634) When an lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is applied to an expression E, and either - [(2.1)](#2.1) E is not potentially evaluated, or - [(2.2)](#2.2) the evaluation of E results in the evaluation of a member Ex of the set of potential results of E, and Ex names a variable x that is not odr-used by Ex ([[basic.def.odr]](basic.def.odr "6.3 One-definition rule")), the value contained in the referenced object is not accessed[.](#2.sentence-1) [*Example [1](#example-1)*: struct S { int n; };auto f() { S x { 1 };constexpr S y { 2 };return [&](bool b) { return (b ? y : x).n; };}auto g = f();int m = g(false); // undefined behavior: access of x.n outside its lifetimeint n = g(true); // OK, does not access y.n — *end example*] [3](#3) [#](http://github.com/Eelis/draft/tree/9adde4bc1c62ec234483e63ea3b70a59724c745a/source/expressions.tex#L659) The result of the conversion is determined according to the following rules: - [(3.1)](#3.1) If T is cv std​::​nullptr_t, the result is a null pointer constant ([[conv.ptr]](conv.ptr "7.3.12 Pointer conversions"))[.](#3.1.sentence-1) [*Note [1](#note-1)*: Since the conversion does not access the object to which the glvalue refers, there is no side effect even if T is volatile-qualified ([[intro.execution]](intro.execution "6.10.1 Sequential execution")), and the glvalue can refer to an inactive member of a union ([[class.union]](class.union "11.5 Unions"))[.](#3.1.sentence-2) — *end note*] - [(3.2)](#3.2) Otherwise, if T has a class type, the conversion copy-initializes the result object from the glvalue[.](#3.2.sentence-1) - [(3.3)](#3.3) Otherwise, if the object to which the glvalue refers contains an invalid pointer value ([[basic.compound]](basic.compound "6.9.4 Compound types")), the behavior isimplementation-defined[.](#3.3.sentence-1) - [(3.4)](#3.4) Otherwise, if the bits in the value representation of the object to which the glvalue refers are not valid for the object's type, the behavior is undefined[.](#3.4.sentence-1) [*Example [2](#example-2)*: bool f() {bool b = true; char c = 42; memcpy(&b, &c, 1); return b; // undefined behavior if 42 is not a valid value representation for bool} — *end example*] - [(3.5)](#3.5) Otherwise, the object indicated by the glvalue is read ([[defns.access]](defns.access "3.1 access"))[.](#3.5.sentence-1) Let V be the value contained in the object[.](#3.5.sentence-2) If T is an integer type, the prvalue result is the value of type T congruent ([[basic.fundamental]](basic.fundamental "6.9.2 Fundamental types")) to V, andV otherwise[.](#3.5.sentence-3) [4](#4) [#](http://github.com/Eelis/draft/tree/9adde4bc1c62ec234483e63ea3b70a59724c745a/source/expressions.tex#L702) [*Note [2](#note-2)*: See also [[basic.lval]](basic.lval "7.2.1 Value category")[.](#4.sentence-1) — *end note*] [43)](#footnote-43)[43)](#footnoteref-43) For historical reasons, this conversion is called the “lvalue-to-rvalue” conversion, even though that name does not accurately reflect the taxonomy of expressions described in [[basic.lval]](basic.lval "7.2.1 Value category")[.](#footnote-43.sentence-1) [44)](#footnote-44)[44)](#footnoteref-44) In C++ class and array prvalues can have cv-qualified types[.](#footnote-44.sentence-1) This differs from C, in which non-lvalues never have cv-qualified types[.](#footnote-44.sentence-2)