[diff.cpp11.basic]

# Annex C (informative) Compatibility [[diff]](./#diff)

## C.5 C++ and ISO C++ 2011 [[diff.cpp11]](diff.cpp11#basic)

### C.5.3 [[basic]](basic "6 Basics"): basics [diff.cpp11.basic]

[1](#1)

[#](http://github.com/Eelis/draft/tree/9adde4bc1c62ec234483e63ea3b70a59724c745a/source/compatibility.tex#L1995)

**Affected subclause:** [[basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation]](basic.stc.dynamic.deallocation)  


**Change:** New usual (non-placement) deallocator[.](#1.sentence-1)

  


**Rationale:** Required for sized deallocation[.](#1.sentence-2)

  


**Effect on original feature:** Valid C++ 2011 code can declare a global placement allocation function and
deallocation function as follows:void* operator new(std::size_t, std::size_t);void operator delete(void*, std::size_t) noexcept;

In this revision of C++, however, the declaration of operator delete might match a predefined usual (non-placement)operator delete ([[basic.stc.dynamic]](basic.stc.dynamic "6.8.6.5 Dynamic storage duration"))[.](#1.sentence-4)

If so, the
program is ill-formed, as it was for class member allocation functions and
deallocation functions ([[expr.new]](expr.new "7.6.2.8 New"))[.](#1.sentence-5)