From e0ce0f9183601da9c9f3c214ad24c8e831a5a16a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Turner Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 08:25:55 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update 03-Style.md Make additional note about `t_` and `m_` suggested prefixes. Closes #11 --- 03-Style.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/03-Style.md b/03-Style.md index b11ce68..58e9393 100644 --- a/03-Style.md +++ b/03-Style.md @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Name function parameters with an `t_` prefix. `t_` can be thought of as "the", b By using `t_` for parameters and `m_` for module data, we can have consistency with both public members of structs and private members of classes. -Any prefix or postfix can be chosen for your organization. This is just one example. +Any prefix or postfix can be chosen for your organization. This is just one example. This suggestion is controversial, for a discussion about it see issue [#11](https://github.com/lefticus/cppbestpractices/issues/11). ```cpp struct Size