Mirrors/cppbestpractices
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/cppbestpractices.git synced 2025-12-17 11:14:35 +03:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Do not define a variadic function

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
rob100
2015-09-15 14:51:52 +02:00
parent d3a6edba2e
commit 4a3abb8232
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
04-Considering_Safety.md
View File

@@ -128,6 +128,10 @@ Additionally the C++ cast style is more visible and has the possibility to searc
But consider refactoring of program logic (for example, additional checking on overflow and underflow) if you need to cast `double` to `int`. Measure three times and cut 0.9999999999981 times. But consider refactoring of program logic (for example, additional checking on overflow and underflow) if you need to cast `double` to `int`. Measure three times and cut 0.9999999999981 times.
## Do not define a variadic function
Variadic functions can accept a variable number of parameters. The probably best known example is printf(). You have the possibility to define this kind of functions by yourself but this is a possible security risk. The usage of variadic functions is not type safe and the wrong input parameters can cause a program termination with an undefined behavior. This undefined behavior can be exploited to a security problem.
If you have the possibility to use a compiler that supports C++11, you can use variadic templates instead.
## Additional Resources ## Additional Resources
[How to Prevent The Next Heartbleed](http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/heartbleed.html) by David Wheeler is a good analysis of the current state of code safety and how to ensure safe code. [How to Prevent The Next Heartbleed](http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/heartbleed.html) by David Wheeler is a good analysis of the current state of code safety and how to ensure safe code.