From 01ab3b9fa5f43097682f741a7daeae95586ef759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Turner <jason@emptycrate.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 22:20:03 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Add example for explicit conversion operators

---
 03-Style.md | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/03-Style.md b/03-Style.md
index adaaff8..591dadb 100644
--- a/03-Style.md
+++ b/03-Style.md
@@ -349,6 +349,23 @@ Instead mark single parameter constructors as `explicit`, which requires them to
 
 Similarly to single parameter constructors, conversion operators can be called by the compiler and introduce unexpected overhead. They should also be marked as `explicit`.
 
+```cpp
+//bad idea
+struct S {
+  operator int() {
+    return 2;
+  }
+};
+```
+
+```cpp
+//good idea
+struct S {
+  explicit operator int() {
+    return 2;
+  }
+};
+```
 
 ## Consider the Rule of Zero