From a68ace40df5806d08d25ef5f0f57ab0436e727eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thibault Kruse <thibault.kruse@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:05:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] use markdown link instead of html link

---
 CppCoreGuidelines.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index bede6c0..274ebb5 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -3374,7 +3374,7 @@ The standard library requires that all classes it deals with have destructors th
 None have succeeded to come up with a general scheme.
 This can be be a real practical problem: For example, what about a sockets that won't close?
 The writer of a destructor does not know why the destructor is called and cannot "refuse to act" by throwing an exception.
-See <a =href="#Sd-dtor">discussion</a>.
+See [discussion](#Sd-dtor).
 To make the problem worse, many "close/release" operations are not retryable.
 If at all possible, consider failure to close/cleanup a fundamental design error and terminate.