From 6c29e226d8d6dd07392928ec2af01a5c26db63af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Derek Li <derek.ldn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:55:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] P.11 call vector reserve(100) instead of vector(100)

---
 CppCoreGuidelines.md | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index f02b617..de51294 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -998,7 +998,8 @@ This is low-level, verbose, and error-prone.
 For example, we "forgot" to test for memory exhaustion.
 Instead, we could use `vector`:
 
-    vector<int> v(100);
+    vector<int> v;
+    v.reserve(100);
     // ...
     for (int x; cin >> x; ) {
         // ... check that x is valid ...