From 63316bc0dc64856b334f4808751166e53fd58a1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hsutter <herb.sutter@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:04:32 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Corrected F.54, part 2

---
 CppCoreGuidelines.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/CppCoreGuidelines.md b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
index b64d7d0..2943112 100644
--- a/CppCoreGuidelines.md
+++ b/CppCoreGuidelines.md
@@ -3072,7 +3072,7 @@ It's confusing. Writing `[=]` in a member function appears to capture by value,
 
             auto lambda = [=]{ use(i,x); };   // BAD: "looks like" copy/value capture
                 // notes: [&] has identical semantics and copies the this pointer under the current rules
-                //        [=,this] and [&,this] are identical in this case, and still confusing in general
+                //        [=,this] and [&,this] are not much better, and confusing
             x = 42;
             lambda(); // calls use(42);
             x = 43;